Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Google, Facebook and Twitter ‘passing the buck’ over terror threat, says MPs

A Commons report says social media networks are "the vehicle of choice in spreading propaganda" (istock)
A Commons report says social media networks are "the vehicle of choice in spreading propaganda" (istock)

Social media giants are “consciously failing” to tackle the use of their sites to promote terrorism, a Commons report claims.

Companies such as Google, Facebook and Twitter were accused of “passing the buck” and leaving parts of cyberspace “ungoverned and lawless” in a scathing critique.

The internet has a huge impact in contributing to individuals turning to extremism, hatred and murder, the Home Affairs Select Committee warned.

Its report said networks like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube are “the vehicle of choice in spreading propaganda” and have become the “recruiting platforms for terrorism”.

Labour MP Keith Vaz, chairman of the committee, said forums, message boards and social media platforms are “the lifeblood of Daesh” – also known as Islamic State (IS) – and other terrorist groups for recruitment and financing.

He said: “Huge corporations like Google, Facebook and Twitter, with their billion-dollar incomes, are consciously failing to tackle this threat and passing the buck by hiding behind their supranational legal status, despite knowing that their sites are being used by the instigators of terror.”

Mr Vaz added: “The companies’ failure to tackle this threat has left some parts of the internet ungoverned, unregulated and lawless.”

It is “alarming” that teams of “only a few hundred” employees monitor billions of accounts, while Twitter does not proactively report extremist content to law enforcement agencies, according to the report.

IS has assembled a vast online propaganda machine – presenting authorities with a major challenge to contain the threat of radicalisation.

Earlier this year, figures revealed a British police team is removing extremist content at a rate of nearly 300 pieces every day.

Last week it emerged that authorities had struggled to get cleric Anjem Choudary’s online posts taken down, even after he was arrested for inviting support for IS.

Choudary was convicted and is facing jail. His Twitter account, which had amassed 32,000 followers, is no longer visible.

The committee called for companies to publish quarterly statistics showing how many sites and accounts they have taken down and why.

It also recommended that a specialist police unit set up to target terror-related material online is upgraded into a round-the-clock “central hub”.

Mr Vaz added: “The Government must develop an effective counter-narrative to the slick and effective propaganda machine being run by Daesh.”

The report said Twitter, Facebook and Google all told the committee they took their responsibilities in the area very seriously and co-operated with security agencies as necessary.

Last week Twitter disclosed that it had taken down 235,000 accounts for violating policies related to promotion of terrorism in six months from February – bringing the number of suspensions to 360,000 since the middle of last year.

In an update setting out the figures, the microblogging site said: “As noted by numerous third parties, our efforts continue to drive meaningful results, including a significant shift in this type of activity off of Twitter.”

Google told the committee it had removed more than 14 million videos globally in 2014 in relation to all types of abuse.

The current threat level for international terrorism is severe, meaning an attack is highly likely. Around 850 people linked to the UK and regarded as a security threat are believed to have taken part in the Syrian conflict, with just under half thought to have returned.

Simon Milner, director of policy at Facebook UK, said: “As I made clear in my evidence session, terrorists and the support of terrorist activity are not allowed on Facebook and we deal swiftly and robustly with reports of terrorism-related content.

“In the rare instances that we identify accounts or material as terrorist, we’ll also look for and remove relevant associated accounts and content.

“Online extremism can only be tackled with a strong partnership between policymakers, civil society, academia and companies.

“For years we have been working closely with experts to support counter speech initiatives, encouraging people to use Facebook and other online platforms to condemn terrorist activity and to offer moderate voices in response to extremist ones.”

Security Minister Ben Wallace said the battle against terrorist recruiters “must be fought on several fronts including online as well as in our communities”.

He said extremism “is not something that can be defeated by Government and law enforcement alone –  it is vital that everyone plays their part”.

He added: “We are working closely with internet companies and want to see a swifter, more automated approach to the identification and removal of content from social media sites, not just in the UK but across the world.”


READ MORE

Terrorism is damaging the confidence of a generation of young people

New counter-terrorism strategy ‘could make fight even harder’, MPs warn