Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

A Master-ly week is what Padraig Harrington has to rediscover

Post Thumbnail

Padraig Harrington’s golf game has been on a slippery slope ever since his third Major victory in 2008.

A miracle is needed if Padraig Harrington is not to miss his first Masters since the turn of the Millennium.

After 14 visits on the trot to Augusta, the three-time Major champion looks certain to miss out on a trip up Magnolia Lane this time round.

The misfiring Irishman has slipped from World No 4 in 2008 off the back of back-to-back Open titles and a US PGA triumph to today’s position of 155 in the Official World Golf Rankings.

Only a win in this week’s Shell Houston Open can secure him a place at the year’s opening Major.

If Harrington needs anything to focus his mind he only has to look at 2002 Players Champion, Craig Perks.

Perks, who won the tournament generally accepted as having the strongest field in golf, decided to go ahead back then with an overhaul of his winning swing that produced a 3-2-4 finish.

That had included two sensational chip-ins on 16 and 18 on one of the most difficult three finishing holes in the game.

Harrington ditched coaching guru Bob Torrance after three Majors in 13 months. He has been winless since his last one the USPGA in 2008 despite constant tinkering with his swing.

The irony is Perks, now a TV commentator after becoming a paramount example of the old saying: ‘If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!’, admits he has a lot of sympathy for Harrington.

“Well, it was something that I thought necessary, it had to be done,” he recalls.

“And I think what happened when I did make those changes was I lost the ability to score, to play this game.”

In Perks defence, he was not in Harrington’s league when he made the changes.

“At that time it wasn’t difficult at all for me because when I looked at my statistics at the end of 2002 even though I was 36th on the money list I was 195th in ball striking,” he points out.

“There were only nine guys that hit it worse than I did, so I knew I needed to do something.

“I think the way I went about it was incorrect,” he continues.

“I should have just stuck with a method and made minor changes instead of completely overhauling the whole thing from Day One. Just making little changes and going to something else, instead of starting with the set-up and backswing.

“It wasn’t a bad decision, but the way I approached it, in hindsight, was wrong.”

Most pundits believe Harrington, one of the game’s incessant swing ‘tinkerers’, has been guilty of overkill since leaving Bob Torrance.

But will it work for Harrington?

“Well he is working way harder than any other player on the range on a Sunday,” says Perks.

“The indications are he is on the right track, and his swing is in pretty good shape.”

The $64,000 question is, will Harrington grab a happy ending by securing victory in Houston this week and the ticket to the Masters that would bring?