Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

80% of football fans want to see VAR introduced in major competitions, according to survey

Video Assistant Referee (VAR) system pitchside (PA)
Video Assistant Referee (VAR) system pitchside (PA)

ALMOST four in five football fans believe a video assistant referee (VAR) should be introduced within major football competitions, according to a survey of 2,000 supporters.

The survey, which asked fans whether VAR should be used in competitions such as the Premier League, FA Cup and Champions League, found 78% supported the idea, with just 8% of fans rejecting its use within football.

The findings from BonusCodeBets.co.uk also found that the main reason given for not using VAR in matches was a dislike of change within the game. 64% fans who do not want to see the introduction of VAR said this is because football should “stay true to its origins”.

Just half rejected use of the technology on the grounds that it causes too many stoppages during games (49%).

But a quarter of other VAR-sceptics would support its implementation if improvements were made to its current application.

According to fans, the main improvements they would like to see for VAR are:

  • 37% would prefer a limit on the number of appeals teams can make
  • 34% think video replays of the analysis should be played within stadiums
  • A quarter would like to see a stop-clock introduced in matches to prevent time being wasted by VAR
  • 23% think referees should have a time limit to make decisions
  • One in five would like officials to explain their decisions to spectators, as with rugby or American football

Fans were able to form their opinions on the current use of VAR after the recent trials in cup fixtures and international friendlies, and these helped change the mind of nearly one in five fans, who expressed a newfound support for using video assistants (17%).

However, the trials were less impressive for others – 9% now no longer want to see the technology introduced, after the recent tests.

Among Premier League fans, VAR is most highly supported by Brighton and Southampton, with 100% of followers surveyed from both clubs expressing a wish for its full implementation.

Burnley and Stoke supporters are the least keen on the idea as a third of Clarets (33%) and a quarter of Potters (25%) rejected VAR.

And for general football fans or followers of clubs outside the Premier League, an enthusiasm for a video assistant was lower (66%) compared to the average across all supporters.

Others may not feel a need for the technology because current refereeing standards are already up to scratch. This is especially apparent for fans of Bournemouth, with nine in ten supporters rating the standard of refereeing as “Good” or “Very good”, compared to an average of 76% across the Premier League.