Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Charity warns that NI hikes could price OAPs out of residential care

© ShutterstockPost Thumbnail

Care homes across Scotland are ramping up fees – and blaming Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ increase to employers’ National Insurance contributions as the single biggest driver of the rise.

Residents are facing hikes of up to 9.5% this year, with the most expensive homes now charging £3,000 per week.

Although Reeves said she would not raise tax, in last year’s budget she did announce employers’ National Insurance contributions (NICs) would rise from 13.8% to 15%, which has put a huge strain on the care sector, where staff wages make up a major part of overall costs.

Now Scotland’s major charity for the elderly has warned the rises risk making residential care unaffordable for some elderly people.

Katherine Crawford, chief executive of Age Scotland, said: “We are concerned that passing the cost onto self-funded care home residents could put long-term residential care beyond the reach of many older people.”

The sector has also faced increased costs for insurance, food, medical supplies, maintenance and materials as well as energy bills and the increase in the National Living Wage (NLW).

HC-One, one of the UK’s largest operators with 275 care homes specialising in dementia, nursing and residential care has increased costs by 9.5% for self-funding residents.

It said: “The increases to NICs and the NLW will have a significant and exceptional impact on our costs moving forward. Like many companies and individuals, we are also experiencing considerable cost increases in essential areas such as food and medications, all of which are vital to the daily operation of our care homes.

“As such, like many other providers across the sector, we have made the difficult decision to raise fees, while doing our utmost to balance the difficulties of fee increases for our residents and their families with the need to ensure our care colleagues are fairly rewarded for the important job they do, and that our homes remain financially stable.”

The cost of private care homes varies, costing from £970 per week. Some of the most luxurious care homes can cost up to £2,750 per week.

Barchester Canmore Lodge Care Home in Dunfermline starts from £2,169, with Woodlands Care Home, Aberdeen costing from £2,415 per week. Fees depend on individual care requirements.

Both Abbotsford Care and Randolph Hill, who operate care homes across Scotland, have also increased costs.

Fees for Randolph Hill cost between £1,800-£1,900 per week for a standard room, but deluxe rooms are to £2,400 per week. Randolph Hill said that the increase in NICs will put an additional 4.7% on their wage bill and will mean that the fee increase will need to be significantly more than 5% this year.

It said: “As a company, our increases had been consistently below 5% before the pandemic. During and afterwards, we have had larger increases both with increased purchases needed, but primarily because of higher inflation. This year we had anticipated keeping any increase below 5% as inflation had fallen [although wage increases within the sector are still higher than general inflation].”

Private homes often tend to be funded by the individual, through the sale of their home or pension, but some are publicly funded – around three quarters of HC-One’s residents are.

Abbotsford said it had been a difficult but necessary step to increase weekly fees given the rise in operating costs.

“The growing disparity between what local authorities pay and what it actually costs to deliver quality care, results in services currently receiving almost £200 less per resident, per week than is needed to meet even the most basic sustainability threshold. That level of underfunding isn’t just unsustainable, it’s unfair, and it places enormous strain on services.

“The recent decision by the government not to support an exemption for care providers from the increase in employers’ NI contributions has only intensified that pressure.

“At a time when the sector is crying out for support in order to make the changes it wants to make, moves like this actively undermine our ability to do what we want to do in our services, training, and make those long-term improvements in care.

“We understand that these are challenging times for everyone, but when policy decisions continue to overlook the realities of frontline care, it puts the entire system at risk. Sustainable care should not be a luxury – it should be a given.”

Scottish Care, the umbrella body for the private care sector, said soaring costs made it very difficult to avoid putting up fees.

It said: “A key challenge is the ongoing underfunding of social care. The rate of pay for care workers is set by the Scottish Government and falls far below what it costs to deliver care and support. The amount paid by government to social care providers is less than the actual cost of delivering care, forcing providers to pay workers the lower rate set by government. This is particularly concerning for the coming year, as employer National Insurance increases have not been sufficiently factored into government cost models.

“Scottish Care calls on the Scottish Government to truly value social care by funding it appropriately.”

The Scottish Government said: “We remain deeply concerned about the impact the UK Government’s increase in employers NI contributions will have on social care in Scotland, which we estimate will cost the sector over £95m.

“Our 2025/26 budget provides an additional £125m to enable adult social care workers delivering direct care in commissioned services to be paid at least £12.60 an hour, in line with the Real Living Wage. This takes our total investment in improving social care pay to £950 million.”

Availability is already a challenge, but it is about to become more difficult

© MIKE WILKINSON
Age Scotland CEO Katherine Crawford

By Katherine Crawford, chief executive of Age Scotland

We understand that private care homes, like all businesses, are going to be affected by higher energy bills and the increase in employer National Insurance contributions next month. But we are concerned that passing the cost onto self-funded care home residents could put long-term care beyond the reach of many older people.

Private care homes make up 76% of the 775 care homes in Scotland and are home to more than 25,000 older people, so the financial situation is precarious for all concerned. It is important that older people and their families are involved with discussions about raising care home fees.

The availability of affordable care home places in Scotland is already a huge challenge. The number of operational care homes has fallen by 18% over the past decade, with rural communities, in particular, struggling to provide enough places. It is clear that delivering good quality social care in care home settings cannot be done without sustainable and substantial investment.

We know that local authority budgets are under strain, but unless money is invested to keep council care homes open for older people who do not have the resources to pay private care home fees, the situation is going to deteriorate further. Scotland needs greater availability of care homes and community care services. Rising costs makes that more difficult to achieve and we are very worried about what the future holds for older people who need – and deserve – affordable residential care.