Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Chris Deerin: If the fish rots from the head then this election campaign is starting to smell

© Hollie Adams/Getty ImagesPrime Minister Boris Johnson
Prime Minister Boris Johnson

According to the BBC, 2.3 million people watched Andrew Neil interview Nigel Farage on Thursday night. The main event was not, in fact, the interrogation of the ruddy Brexiteer, but what followed.

Dismissing Farage, Neil turned directly to the camera to say that, despite the BBC’s best efforts, Boris Johnson had refused to agree a date. “No broadcaster can compel a leader to be interviewed but it has been a key part of the BBC’s prime-time election coverage for decades,” said Neil.

“We do them to scrutinise and hold to account those who would govern us. That is democracy. We have always proceeded in good faith that the leaders would participate and in every election they have, all of them, until this one.”

A clip of this short, pointed oration went viral on social media. There was outrage at Johnson’s cowardice, fury at the BBC for failing to secure the Prime Minister before proceeding with the other party leaders, and a lot of debate about whether any of it matters.

Well, it does and it doesn’t. Millions of people are aware Johnson lacks the guts to face the Neil blitzkrieg. Yet I find it vanishingly unlikely that many, if any, of them will change their vote as a result.

Ultimately, there are bigger issues to consider – Brexit, the economy, foreign policy, anti-Semitism, revolutionary socialism, Scottish independence etc. Amid all that, what does one empty chair amount to?

But it matters at a deeper level and in a more insidious way. Professor Bo Rothstein of Gothenburg University, one of the world’s foremost experts on trust in public life, is fond of quoting an old Chinese saying: the fish rots from the head down.

Rothstein’s research has shown that in countries where public leaders behave with honesty and integrity, those values are more commonly found in the general populace. In countries with low levels of honesty and integrity at the top, there tends to be more corruption and less trust throughout society.

If you transplant an individual from one of the latter countries to one of the former, that person’s behaviour often improves. In short, if you believe most other people can be trusted, you will behave in a trustworthy fashion.

This, I think, is the real danger of the Trump/Johnson era – the destruction of good faith.

Western democratic politics has long been governed by an unwritten ethical code. You don’t tell outright lies. When it comes to the crunch you put the interests of your country above your own. You don’t shut down Parliament to avoid scrutiny. You don’t boot out of your party everyone who disagrees with you. You turn up for the interview. You understand the ethical code is there for a reason.

This election campaign has ended all that. It has been an exercise in bad faith. Lies have been told repeatedly, by both main UK parties.

In better times, the character of the two potential candidates for PM would exclude them from that office. Both men are putting ideology and self-aggrandisement ahead of the national good. They are unravelling the conventions that usually act as national stabilisers.

We can all see the fish’s head decaying – what worries me is what happens next.