Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Experts warn UK consumers ‘could eat dirty poultry’ after post-Brexit deal with US

A briefing paper prepared by three professors said British shoppers would be safer if the UK kept European Union standards on food production and called for future controls to be "stricter, not weaker". (iStock)
A briefing paper prepared by three professors said British shoppers would be safer if the UK kept European Union standards on food production and called for future controls to be "stricter, not weaker". (iStock)

 

A post-Brexit trade deal with the US could result in UK consumers eating chlorinated turkey, chicken and other poultry that has been washed in chemicals but remains “dirty”, food policy experts have said.

A briefing paper prepared by three professors said British shoppers would be safer if the UK kept European Union standards on food production and called for future controls to be “stricter, not weaker”.

The report, released on Monday, comes after Donald Trump’s commerce secretary Wilbur Ross said during a visit to the UK last month that compliance with EU food standards on GM crops and chlorine-washed chicken could pose problems in negotiations between the US and UK following Brexit.

Mr Ross claimed the EU restrictions were “really not science-based”.

The report said gaps in available scientific knowledge were so great that the use of the chemicals in the US was not “on the basis of sound science” – and accused Mr Ross of indulging in “wishful thinking”.

Professor Erik Millstone, from the University of Sussex, worked with professors Tim Lang (City, University of London) and Terry Marsden (Cardiff University), to write the paper.

Prof Millstone said: “The UK should continue to insist on improving hygiene standards in poultry farms, slaughter houses and meat-cutting plants and not allow standards to decline, nor try relying on chemical disinfectants to reduce the harm that filthy meat can cause.

“UK consumers would be safer to keep EU standards and not to accept US disinfectant-washed-but-still-dirty poultry.”

The team compared current UK and EU standards with those in the US, where poultry is washed in up to four chemical disinfectants called pathogen reduction treatments (PRTs) and statistics show 97% of chicken breast meat contains pathogens such as salmonella and E.coli.

They found the chemicals were also used there to wash fruit, vegetables and fish which Prof Lang said “shocked” them.

The authors said PRTs were used to reduce the amount of “filth” – especially excrement – on the meat but did not eliminate bacterial contamination.

In the EU, where the only liquid producers are allowed to wash meat with is potable water, the approach is to “require the poultry trade to deliver carcasses and cuts of meat that are sufficiently clean that they do not require washing in disinfectant,” they wrote.

The paper warned the use of chemical disinfectants by the US food industry posed risks to consumers and workers in the industry.

It also said the use of PRTs may worsen the chances that disinfectant-resistant bacteria will emerge.

Prof Marsden said: “This is one of a series of food safety concerns of which consumers need to be aware as the Brexit process continues.

“The UK needs to improve its intensive food production and processing standards and not put both animals and consumers at risk.”

The professors made a series of recommendations including calling on the UK Government to make an “explicit and enduring” commitment to maintaining food safety and quality standards at least at current levels and for consumers to reject “US disinfectant-washed” poultry.