Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Gordon Smith: Willie Collum’s faux pas in sending off Rangers star Daniel Candeias may bring about a change

Willie Collum shows Daniel Candeias the red card (SNS Group)
Willie Collum shows Daniel Candeias the red card (SNS Group)

WILLIE COLLUM made a major mistake in sending off Daniel Candeias at St Mirren Park last week.

Yet as bad as the Rangers player may feel about the incident right now, some good should come of his dismissal.

I say that because I believe the incident has flagged up a flawed area in our regulations.

One which all logic suggests should be rectified by a simple rule change in time before the beginning of next season.

As things stand, yellow cards can only be overturned in Scotland on two grounds.

The first is mistaken identity – the basis for Rangers’ appeal in this case – and the second is simulation.

Red cards are more serious, so they really only have to be shown to have been given in error to get them thrown out or downgraded.

Where the problem lies is that a sending-off brought about by two bookings is treated in the same way as the lesser offence, instead of the compounded punishment.

It is clearly the wrong approach.

If a sending-off came about because one of the yellows was given in error – as in this case where the second booking of Candeias was clearly a ridiculous decision – the situation should be easily fixable.

And changing the rule will benefit not just Rangers, but all Scottish football clubs.

In fact, I would go further. Back when I was the SFA’s Chief Executive, I tried in vain to get an exemption made for yellow cards issued in cup semi-finals so they could effectively not be treated as if they were reds.

It made no sense to me then, and it doesn’t still. A player could get booked in error and subsequently be banned from the final of the competition with no right of appeal.

You have to remember that in many cases, this might be the only chance the person concerned would get to play in such a showpiece. To deny them that opportunity is completely unfair.

Again it would be an easy change to make.

What I am not so sure about is Rangers’ decision to lodge a complaint about Collum in the wake of the incidents.

It is a strong stance for the club to take and I have to say it surprised me. It will be very interesting to see how the SFA respond.

Their action looks to have been borne out of sheer frustration about the Candeias decision, but I am not sure what they hope to gain from it.

Whatever charges can be levelled at Collum, he is not biased. Not against Rangers or any team.

Like all referees, he makes mistakes. They are only human.

As Celtic fans have been quick to point out, it was the same official who failed to send off Rangers keeper Allan McGregor for kicking out at Kristoffer Ajer in the Old Firm derby back in September.

So things even themselves out, to an extent at least.

It is also worth pointing out that because Willie is regarded by the SFA as one of our very top officials, he gets a lot of big games. These bring more scrutiny than those further down the scale.

So I will be very surprised if the complaint is upheld.

The general principle about being unable to appeal the yellow, though, is a different thing altogether and should hopefully bring about positive change.

All managers must act with decorum

The people having a go at me for arguing Neil Lennon needs to watch his behaviour on the touchline lack football intelligence.

I made it clear on this page last week that I was not stating he brought anything on himself at Tynecastle.

Not the coin which struck him, nor the nasty verbal abuse.

Rather, my point was that as a manager, he has to act in a responsible manner while in the technical area. Especially in the volatile atmosphere of an Edinburgh derby.

Managers are figureheads and ambassadors for their clubs and, for me anyway, have to act with dignity and decorum while carrying out the role.

The standards that apply to players must also apply to those who lead them.