Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

It should never have happened… It has to change: Mum’s relief as jail threat lifted after abusive ex drops access fight

The mum and her son  who now, she says, have a chance of a happy future
The mum and her son who now, she says, have a chance of a happy future

A violent dad whose battered ­ex-partner faced jail over her refusal to let him see their son has dropped his legal case for access.

The mum, 24, from Glasgow, was fined £1,000 by Sheriff Aisha Anwar last year for contempt of a court order giving her son’s father access, despite him failing to attend anger management courses.

We told, in October, how the court warned she could face up to 28 days in jail if she continued to disobey the order as the violent dad continued to demand she “be punished”.

But last week the father finally withdrew his case after a five-year legal battle, and agreed not to fight for access to his son.

The mum said: “I feel a huge burden has been lifted from us. After years of nightmare legal battles, I can finally start to enjoy my wee family without having to worry about whether I’d be thrown in jail.

“I can’t thank The Sunday Post enough for highlighting this issue.

“I hope our victory will give others encouragement to fight for what they believe to be right, and the justice system is forced to look again at how they handle cases like this. A court upheld that I was a battered mum and there were very sound reasons why I, and the court-appointed social worker, had concerns about access and the fact my ex failed to attend anger management despite the recommendation of that expert there should be no unsupervised access until then.

“It was devastating to ­discover the system appeared not to take his conviction and the expert concerns into account because I was ordered to take our son to see his father and very quickly he was given unsupervised access.”

The mum said her “nightmare” began just two weeks after her baby was born when his father assaulted her at her home in Maryhill.

Her former partner was convicted in 2018 at Dumbarton Sheriff Court over the 2014 attack, and given a suspended sentence.

The mum said: “I truly believed that either I or my baby were going to be badly hurt or killed that day.

“We’d split up by the time it happened. He lost his temper and slammed me against a wall because I wouldn’t let him take the baby away for several hours on his own because I was breastfeeding.”

The mum said she was shattered to receive a huge fine for contempt.

“I was struggling on ­little more than £50 a week income support and my baby son’s father was paying just £4 for his upkeep when Sheriff Anwar fined me £1,000 last year.

“Because my ex ­continued to claim I was breaking an access agreement and demanded I be further punished, I was warned in court I’d face jail.”

The mum ended up on antidepressants” and had to abandon her teacher training course.

Now she plans to go back to university in the summer.She said: “I finally feel we have a chance of a happy future.”

The mum gave evidence to Scottish Government ministers as they prepared reforms to the Children (Scotland) Bill last year, but she hopes further change is on the cards.

Her MSP Bob Doris said: “She has finally secured a positive outcome through the courts, not because of the system but rather despite it. We have made the Scottish Government well aware of the deficiencies that exist.”

Glasgow City Council child protection officers launched a probe after the family’s GP raised concerns last August that the boy may have been abused during an unsupervised visit.

Solicitor Advocate Mark O’Hanlon, who specialises in child custody cases and acted for the mum, said: “ I’m delighted we have achieved this outcome, and hope it gives others in the same situation the courage to fight on.”