Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Men with poor backgrounds ‘more likely than wealthy to be single by middle age’

Richer men in their early 40s in Britain are also more likely to be living with a partner (iStock)
Richer men in their early 40s in Britain are also more likely to be living with a partner (iStock)

 

MEN from poor backgrounds are around twice as likely to be single than those from rich families by the time they reach early middle age, analysis has found.

As well as being more likely to be in highly-paid jobs or even working at all, richer men in their early 40s in Britain are also more likely to be living with a partner, according to the findings from the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS).

It found the likelihood of being in a relationship, and a partner’s level of earnings, are increasingly related to family background.

In 2012, around one in three (33%) men aged 42 from from the poorest fifth of households lived alone, the research found. This compared with one in seven (15%) of their counterparts from rich backgrounds living without a partner.

Men from low income households were more than twice as likely to be divorced as those from high-income backgrounds, at 11% versus 5% and nearly twice as likely never to have been married, at 36% versus 20%.

Richer men were also more likely to have higher-earning partners. The partners of men from richer backgrounds tended to earn around 73% more than the partners of men from poorer families, the research found.

As women’s earnings are an increasingly important part of a household’s income, these trends significantly reduce the household incomes of men who grew up in poor families compared with those of men who grew up in rich families, the IFS said.

The report suggested this is quite a “new divide”. Among men born 12 years earlier, the differences in partnership status and partner earnings by family background were considerably smaller, the IFS said.

The earnings gap between men with richer parents and their counterparts from less well off backgrounds was also found to be widening.

In 2012, employed 42-year-old men whose parents were among the richest fifth of households earned on average 88% more than those from the poorest families. In 2000, the gap was 47%.

Men from poorer backgrounds were twice as likely to be out of work as those from richer backgrounds.

Only 7% of men growing up in the richest fifth of households were out of work at the age of 42 in 2012, while more than 15% of men from the poorest fifth of households were out of work.

The research explored the importance of family background for household income using several sources, and was produced with funding from Closer, (Cohort and Longitudinal Studies Enhancement Resources).

Chris Belfield, a research economist at the IFS and an author of the paper, said: “Focusing solely on the earnings of men in work understates the importance of family background in determining living standards.

“As well as having higher earnings, those from richer families are more likely to be in work, more likely to have a partner and more likely to have a higher-earning partner than those from less well-off backgrounds.

“And all these inequalities have been widening over time.”

Alison Park, director of Closer, said of the research: “It shows how existing differences in the earnings of men from richer and poorer backgrounds are exacerbated by a new divide, with poorer men in their early 40s being less likely than those from wealthier backgrounds to be living with a partner.”