Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Mandy Rhodes: Principled stand or an assault on democracy, the block on self-ID was entirely predictable

© PAFirst Minister Nicola Sturgeon
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon

New Year and a new constitutional battle. This is how it rolls in Scottish politics. And frankly, it suits both the SNP at Holyrood and the Tories at Westminster.

It keeps them both in a job, throws red meat to their base, and creates a convenient distraction from the real-life troubles both face in government.

But this argument between Holyrood and Westminster feels different. It is, after all, the first time the UK Government has deployed what is being described as the “nuclear option” – invoking Section 35 of the Scotland Act – to thwart a piece of legislation that has been passed by Holyrood but which the Secretary of State believes could impact UK laws.

And crucially for the intensity of the current row, the focus of the law in question has been one of the most divisive of our times. The Gender Recognition Reform Bill which would allow for a marginalised, minority – trans people – to change their legal sex by self-identification.

It is that additional emotive, and highly contested layer which throws shade on whether the true motivations of the UK Government are driven more by political ideology than by legal compliance.

And however much Nicola Sturgeon may resent it and cry “democracy denial”, it is by dint of democracy, that Scotland is not now an independent nation and far from Alister Jack launching what she has called a “full frontal attack” on devolution, it is the Scottish Government that is likely to be tested on whether it has played by the rules.

It was clear all through this whole cack-handed process, riddled as it was, by closed minds and confirmation bias, that there was a risk that this bill was going to conflict with reserved laws. That was at the heart of what women critical of the bill had been saying for years while their concerns were dismissed by the first minister as “not valid”.

UN expert backs gender recognition reforms being considered in Scotland

However, it was also repeatedly raised by the statutory regulator, the Equalities and Human Rights Commission, which was at best, regarded with suspicion at Holyrood and latterly by the UK Government’s women and equalities minister, Kemi Badenoch, who met with Scottish Government ministers just days before the bill was passed before being shooed away as having no agency here. So, to say, as the first minister has, that these issues came from nowhere, is nonsense.

For many women on the left, including independence supporters, who do not fully support the notion of self-ID, it is an anathema to be welcoming the intervention of a Tory secretary of state in thwarting legislation home-grown in Scotland but his reasons behind a Section 35 seemed reasoned and true to both the spirit of devolution and its legal underpinnings. Those reasons may be hard to legally challenge.

The door is, of course, open to the Scottish Government to revisit the bill, bring it back to parliament amended, and legislate for reform they promised.

Cynically though, it is now 18 months since the Supreme Court ruled against the Scottish Government’s attempts to incorporate the United Nations Conventions on the Rights of the Child into Scottish law because, as it stood, it would impact on UK-wide legislation.

The first minister was duly outraged and claimed it left her without the full powers to protect children’s rights. A year and a half later, there is no amended bill, leaving children still waiting and campaigners increasingly angry.

And so, in the case of the Gender Recognition Reform Bill, it is perhaps little wonder that for some the acronym has simply morphed into an expression of their frustration, GRR…

Mandy Rhodes is Editor of Holyrood magazine www.holyrood.com, follow on twitter @holyroodmandy