Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Andy Maciver: There are troubles in store for both of the frontrunners to become new FM

© Jane Barlow/PA WireSNP leadership candidates Humza Yousaf, Kate Forbes and Ash Regan
SNP leadership candidates Humza Yousaf, Kate Forbes and Ash Regan

If you look at any other democracy in the world, you will struggle to find a party as dominant as the SNP.

The party has very nearly 50% of the seats in the Scottish Parliament, fought on a proportional representation system specifically designed to prevent that level of dominance. It has 48 out of 59 seats – more than 80% – at Westminster.

It remains dominant according to current opinion polling. It is expected to win the votes of four in 10 of us at next year’s General Election, and of even more than that at the 2026 election to the Scottish Parliament.

And, yet, the feeling that the SNP is face-down in the mud spreads like wildfire, with a decline in the SNP’s reputation felt in many quarters. The business community. The third sector. And, too, the amorphous “people in the street”, most visibly during the debate on gender recognition reform.

The truth is that this is what happens when political parties achieve such dominance against impotent opposition. It is simply a matter of human nature that entitlement and a degree of arrogance creeps in when nobody is marking your homework!

When the new leader is revealed tomorrow, and, if all goes to plan, elected first minister on Tuesday, they face a first 100 days arguably more challenging than any previous inhabitant of Bute House. However, the political problems faced in those first 100 days would be very different for Humza Yousaf than they would for Kate Forbes (presuming polling is correct to label this a two-horse race).

Yousaf has two issues to address immediately. First, he has to prove his statesmanship and competence. This has been questioned, often unfairly, and he needs to prove the doubters wrong with strong performances in parliament and in the media. This links to his second issue; the need to put his arms around the acute issues which have troubled the administration in the last six months.

Principal amongst these is the gender recognition reform legislation; rather than focusing on the constitutional element to it, Yousaf could show his mettle by navigating a course which simultaneously satisfies the UK Government, the Greens and the majority of the people.

Forbes’ issues would be quite different. Her first 100 days, or at least the first 50, will be dominated by the holding together of her party. She will need to recruit cabinet secretaries, ministers and advisers who are prepared to sign up to an agenda on the economy and public services which are at best uncomfortable, and at worst alien, to many of them. And she will need to do it all while ensuring that her 64 MSPs keep supporting her in parliament.

If she can navigate those issues; she will find a willing audience outside the bubble, in the business community, in the third sector, and amongst those critical “people in the street”.

Yousaf will find his problems outside parliament; Forbes will find hers in the building. Different problems, but problems nonetheless.


Andy Maciver is founder/director of Message Matters and Zero Matters