Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

The Honest Truth: The science behind what’s in the food we love

© ShutterstockScots doctor James Lind discovered how lemons could help sailors sick with scurvy during a famous 1747 experiment
Scots doctor James Lind discovered how lemons could help sailors sick with scurvy during a famous 1747 experiment

From chips and coffee to pasta and pizza, we enjoy all manner of different dishes – but have you ever thought about what’s in our food? George Zaidan, author of Ingredients, shares with Alice Hinds the Honest Truth and fascinating science behind chemicals in our cooking.

What is the strangest ingredient you have discovered in an everyday food item?

That would have to be cochineal extract, also known as “ground up bugs”. These bugs produce a brilliant red that’s used as a food colouring (after filtering out the bug parts) and as it comes from bugs, it’s 100% natural!

Has your search put you off eating processed foods?

No, not at all. The latest available research suggests that eating 10% more processed food is associated with about a one-year decrease in life expectancy, but there are two important caveats. First, many scientists I interviewed are extremely sceptical of the validity of this result; and second, even those who are not sceptical admit that we don’t know whether processed food is causing the decreased life expectancy.

When I first started my research, I didn’t know how to evaluate scientific studies like this, but now I do – and I hope to give my readers the tools they need to do the same.

Are there really more than 950 different chemicals in coffee beans?

There are likely many more as scientists have only identified 950 so far! Coffee beans are living beings – they’re made up of cells, each of which is chock-full of proteins, DNA, and lots of other chemicals the cell uses to live.

When the beans are roasted, even more chemicals are produced. We forget that plants, the basis of many traditionally processed foods like coffee, pickles and jam are living beings, so full of biochemistry.

Author George Zaidan

If there is cyanide in apple seeds, why does eating them not make us sick?

Apple seeds contain chemicals that, when broken down, produce cyanide, but not nearly enough to make you sick. Cyanide is actually a widespread plant defence strategy – more than 2,000 species of plant produce it.

Some varieties of cassava contain enough cyanide to kill an adult. As chemists say… the dose makes the poison!

Sugar, or glucose, is naturally produced by plants. So, why is too much sugar so bad for us?

We tend to assume that if something is made by a plant, it can’t be bad, or that if something is natural, it must be healthy. Nothing could be further from the truth! The most lethal poison we know, botulism toxin, is completely natural.

Indeed, eating too much of anything, natural or processed, is probably not a good idea. But“too much” can be different from one food to the next, and sometimes that threshold can be fuzzy or completely unknown.

Will we ever decide whether coffee is bad for us?

We’ll be arguing over the risks and benefits of coffee for years. But, I’ll be drinking it every day.

Who is James Lind, and why is he so important for our initial understanding of nutrition?

James Lind was a Scottish doctor who performed an early controlled trial. Trying to find a cure for scurvy, he split patients into groups and tested a different treatment on each group.

Most nutrition research on foods and disease is done via surveys, not controlled trials. It’s a hotly-debated point, and at the heart of whether you should take nutrition headlines seriously.

The most unpronounceable ingredient you’ve ever found listed on a packet?

1-alpha-D-glucopyranosyl-2-beta-D-fructofuranoside.

That’s cheating a bit, though, as this name would never actually appear on a packet. The chemical would be identified by its common name – sugar!

Most chemicals have multiple names, each more complicated than the next. The important thing about a chemical is not whether the name is pronounceable, but how good or bad it is for you. And you can’t tell just by trying to pronounce it.

Ingredients, by George Zaidan, published by Duckworth, is out now.