Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Bionic leg helps people with amputation walk naturally – study

Bionic leg helps people with amputation walk naturally – study (Peter Byrne/PA)
Bionic leg helps people with amputation walk naturally – study (Peter Byrne/PA)

A bionic leg has made it possible for people with below-the-leg amputations to walk more naturally, at a normal speed and walk up and down steps.

The state-of-the-art prosthetic limbs can help people with amputations achieve a natural walking gait, and rely on robotic sensors and controllers that move the limb using algorithms.

In the study, researchers have shown that a natural walking gait is achievable using a prosthetic leg fully driven by the body’s own nervous system.

During the amputation, the surgeon links muscle pairs together within the amputated leg so that when a person moves their phantom limb the natural muscle pairs move and the patient is able to actually feel their phantom limb and its full range of movement.

Researchers took these patients and put electrodes next to each muscle, and measured the electrical pulse to the muscles. A control system then interprets those signals for the control of a robotic prosthesis.

Hugh Herr, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), USA, said: “No previous study was able to show this level of brain control that produces a natural gait where the human nervous system is controlling the movement.”

In a study of seven below-the-knee amputees who had this surgery, the researchers found that they were able to walk faster, avoid obstacles and climb stairs much more naturally than people with a traditional amputation.

Professor Herr, a professor of media arts and sciences, co-director of the K Lisa Yang Centre for Bionics at MIT, an associate member of MIT’s McGovern Institute for Brain Research and the senior author of the new study, said: “No-one has been able to show this level of brain control that produces a natural gait, where the human’s nervous system is controlling the movement, not a robotic control algorithm.”

According to the study, published in Nature Medicine, patients also experienced less pain and less muscle atrophy following this surgery, which is known as the agonist-antagonist myoneural interface (AMI).

So far, about 60 patients around the world have received this type of surgery, which can also be done for people with arm amputations.

“This work represents yet another step in us demonstrating what is possible in terms of restoring function in patients who suffer from severe limb injury,” said Matthew Carty, a surgeon at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and associate professor at Harvard Medical School, who is also an author of the paper.

Enabling nervous system control by the person using the limb is a step toward Prof Herr’s lab’s goal of “rebuilding human bodies,” rather than having people rely on ever more sophisticated robotic controllers and sensors — tools that are powerful but do not feel like part of the user’s body.

He explained: “The problem with that long-term approach is that the user would never feel embodied with their prosthesis.

“They would never view the prosthesis as part of their body, part of self.

“The approach we’re taking is trying to comprehensively connect the brain of the human to the electromechanics.”

Prof Herr, who himself is a double amputee, said he is “absolutely” considering undergoing the procedure himself because it could either work as a new procedure or as a revision technique for older amputations.

The researchers add that the amputation procedure – where instead of natural muscle interactions being severed, the two ends of the muscles are connected so that they still communicate with each other within the residual limb – is already standard procedure in some hospitals, but could become standard procedure more widely.