Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Could pitch invasion during Rangers and Hibs game cost the teams £800,000?

RANGERS v HIBERNIAN HAMPDEN - GLASGOW The Hibernian fans invade the pitch at full-time (SNS Alan Harvey)
RANGERS v HIBERNIAN HAMPDEN - GLASGOW The Hibernian fans invade the pitch at full-time (SNS Alan Harvey)

HIBS and Rangers could be sued jointly for £800,000 over damage caused after the Scottish Cup final – despite being cleared of any blame last week.

Misconduct charges against the clubs were booted out by the SFA on Wednesday, which ruled neither could be held responsible for the pitch rampage by fans.

However, it can now be revealed lawyers acting for Glasgow City Council are considering raising a fresh action to cover the cost of the damage to snazzy digital LED advertising hoardings during the scenes of shame at Hampden in May.

The legal battle kicked off when solicitors acting on behalf of The Football Company Scotland, which owns the hoardings, started legal action against the council to cover the cost of the damage – using early 19th Century legislation.

Rangers and Hibs fans confront each other during the Scottish Cup Final between Rangers and Hibernian at Hampden Park in May (Photo by Ian MacNicol/Getty)
Rangers and Hibs fans confront each other during the Scottish Cup Final between Rangers and Hibernian at Hampden Park in May (Photo by Ian MacNicol/Getty)

But, City Chambers officials are said to be furious they face covering the cost of the trouble. It’s understood the local authority’s claim has not been lodged yet.

But a spokesman for the city council did confirm the body was “considering all of the legal options open to us in respect of the claim made by Football Company Scotland”.

It’s unlikely either club would be insured against such a claim, meaning any successful action by the city council could hit the teams hard.

A council insider said: “A number of people have already been prosecuted for what happened, and there’s clear footage all over the internet showing the vandalism being carried out.

“Taxpayers will be appalled they face having to cough up for the damage.

“Clearly the council will look at all its options, and going after the clubs is one of them.

“The SNP Government has already hinted heavily this week they could order the SFA to introduce a strict liability policy in which clubs are held responsible for their supporters’ behaviour.

“There’s clear disquiet at the use of 200-year-old legislation to sue the council.”

The Football Company Scotland is using the Riotous Assemblies (Scotland) Act 1822 to claim for £800,000 plus VAT from the council.

It says the victim of “any unlawful, riotous or tumultuous assembly of persons” can claim “full compensation for the loss or injury by summary action against the council”.

The Football Company Scotland confirmed to The Sunday Post it was seeking damages but provided no further comment.

The SFA had charged Hibernian with four misconduct charges, including demolition of the Hampden goals, while Rangers faced two vandalism charges.

The Edinburgh club revealed last week it had footed the bill for its fans’ wrecking spree, which resulted in turf being ripped up and the goalposts being damaged.

Details of the payout came as both clubs were cleared of any blame for the scenes that followed the final whistle.

Hibernian’s chief executive, Leeann Dempster, said she hoped the cash settlement would “bring an end to the matter”.

She added the SFA should now focus on putting in place recommendations made by an inquiry into the riot.

Rangers faced two charges of supporters smashing the LED advertising boards and pitch side holdings. But the SFA judicial panel ruled the side was in the clear as there was no provision for punishing them under current rules.

It said the complaint was “irrelevant” and sanctions could not be imposed as it was not signed up to UEFA’s strict liability code, which automatically hammers clubs for fans’ bad behaviour.

Neither Rangers nor Hibs were willing to comment regarding the threat of possible legal action from Glasgow City Council.

The end of season showpiece game descended into violence after Hibs beat Rangers 3-2 in the last minute to lift the cup for the first time in more than 100 years.


READ MORE

Rangers angry at lack of SFA action over cup final pitch invasion

Euro 2016 Daily Digest: Hope for more excitement on the pitch and less trouble off it in the second round of matches